Skip to main content

A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO CRIMINAL PRACTICE IN GHANA

In this brief write-up, I have provided a simple approach to familiarising yourself with criminal law practice. The approach is meant for law students and new practitioners who may not have any experience in criminal prosecution or defence. For more details on specific topics, you can follow this blog on Instagram @criminal_law_blog_gh. I hope you find it useful.

Criminal law practice is a specialised area that requires an appreciation and understanding of the criminal justice system. For law students, the law school usually provides course outlines or manuals with a detailed guide on specific areas that the course will cover and the relevant sources of law. To appreciate this practice area, a lawyer or aspiring lawyer must be familiar with the following: 

A: Key players or stakeholders in the criminal justice system, their powers and roles (police, courts, attorney-general etc.); you should know the following:

-       their mandate or source of power (constitution or statute)

-       their roles

-       their limitations

2. B: Basic concepts – e.g. jurisdiction, constitutional bases of criminal law, double jeopardy, bail, nolle prosequi, withdrawal, sentencing etc. You should know the following:

-       what it is

-       why (the rationale)

-       when (at which stage of procedure it comes into play)

-       how (the process)

-       any legal effect

-       any types (e.g. bail has bail pending trial and bail pending appeal) 

3.  C: Trials and procedures – summary trials, trials on indictment, committal proceedings, interlocutory applications, interlocutory and final appeals, juvenile justice, pre-trial procedures, procedures within trials such as a mini trial etc. You must know:

-       which court has jurisdiction for which procedure.

-       the legal effect of steps taking during proceedings (e.g. under section 184(5) of Act 30, a discharge during committal is not a bar to a subsequent charge in respect of the same facts).

-       For students, you should map out the exact procedures (in clear steps, noting who does what and why) in their notes adding all the relevant sections especially since some of the sections may not necessarily follow e.g. committal proceedings are not just found in part 4 of Act 30 but also in the Sixth Schedule.

-       Pay attention to legal requirements as to time with respect to particular processes or procedures.

4.    D: Drafting

-       Know the difference between a motion (which is always supported by an affidavit setting out reasons for the application) and a petition / notice of appeal (which sets out grounds for appealing).

-       Know which court a particular process can go to.

-       You must know exactly how any process is drafted i.e. the form of the process because every single information on a process is important; pay attention to form in precedents provided.

-       For charge sheets and bills of indictment, it is imperative to know what other documents are added (e.g. brief facts for a charge sheet and summary of evidence and list of exhibits for a bill of indictment)

-       For charge sheets and bills of indictment, it is also imperative to revisit the substantive law on offences; you must know the name of the offence, the section that criminalises the offence which is also referred to as the offence creating section (e.g. section 46 for murder and not 47 because 47 merely defines it) and the elements of the offence which is what is used in drafting the particulars of the charge).

5.    Appreciate the differences and similarities between related concepts (e.g. bail pending trial v bail pending appeal; withdrawal v nolle prosequi; jury trial v trial with assessors; evidence on commission v preservation of testimony; lunacy of accused v defence of lunacy)

Writing submissions or answering questions

·      AIRAC is your primary guide. It stands for:

A - Area of law

I – Legal issues in contention (usually found in the questions set)

R – Relevant law (constitution, legislation, case law etc.  – state the source of the law before adding the content of the law itself)

A – Application of law to the facts in a question

C – Conclusion based on the analysis made

It is crucial that after stating the law, lawyers remember to apply the law to the set facts in the question to resolve the exact issues raised before concluding. A disassociation between the two leaves the questions unanswered. 

A good source of learning for the application of this method of answering questions is case law. A good judgement begins by setting out the facts, identifying the legal issues, setting out the relevant law based on which the issues have emerged, applying the law to the factual situation before coming to reasonable conclusions that resolve the legal issues. 

 

Other learning tips for students:

- Read and brief all cases. You may not have enough time to read them again.

- Read and make notes of texts and other reading materials.

- Revise after lectures to maintain the understanding from class.

- Read each relevant law in any manual provided even if not addressed in class during lectures.

- Review past questions to give you an idea of what is required of students; it also gives a sense of direction to your studies.

- Attend lectures and tutorials if any, because a lack of understanding may lead to a failure to appreciate the course (as a prospective legal practitioner) and may affect your ability to answer exam questions properly.

- Ask questions in class if anything is not clear.

- Practice is essential so work on assignments give, you can attempt past questions and show same to your tutorial master; make notes and ask for help if you need it.

Popular posts from this blog

The Legal Position of Independent Witnesses in Ghana

  The right to fair trial is a fundamental human right recognized in all democracies and entrenched in the 1992 Constitution of Ghana. A key component of fair trial is the right against self-incrimination. This principle is applied in two situations: during interrogation by the police and in the course of a trial.     In the former scenario, which is the subject matter of this article, legislative measures have been put in place to prevent law enforcement officers from compelling confessions from suspects. Thus, in section 120 of the Evidence Act [i] , mandatory guidelines for the taking of confession statements have been provided. These guidelines become more imperative when the law enforcement officers themselves act as independent witnesses in the taking of confessions. The significance of a confession statement cannot be overemphasized; it can serve as the only basis for a conviction. This legal position has been stated in many cases including Bilah Moshie vrs The Rep...

The Process After an Arrest: Remand and Bail in Ghana

Common to all democratic states, every person is entitled to his right to personal liberty and freedom of movement. This right, just like any other human right, has limits. In article 14(1) of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana, the right to liberty can be curtailed when a person is suspected to have committed a criminal offence. A person may be arrested with or without a warrant. In Ghana, four categories of arrests without a warrant exist. They are arrests by officers of law enforcement agencies [i] , private citizens arrests [ii] , arrests by judges [iii]   and arrests by senior prosecuting officers of the Legal Service [iv] . In all these cases, the entity authorised to detain an arrested suspect in lawful custody is a law enforcement agency. This short write-up will set out the processes after an arrested person is placed in custody.   The constitution permits detention for a period of not more than 48 hours after the arrest. [v]  At the end of that period, the detaining...

Is ill health a ground for the grant of bail?

There have been several bail applications I have dealt with where averments in the supporting affidavit have been centered on the ill health of the accused person or convict. Some have gone further to attach medical reports proving the alleged condition. These applications are mostly granted although the reasons given in the rulings are not emphatic that the basis of the grant of bail is the ill health of the applicant.  It is therefore necessary that we answer the question posed in the title: is ill health a ground for the grant of bail. This article  will also look at the circumstances under which ill health will be considered. Let me state from the onset, that detention is not an avenue for the rights of a detainee to be trampled on, especially their rights to life and healthcare. Hence, medical care is offered to persons in police and prison custody at the expense of the state.  Before 2004, the general rule was that ill health was not a ground for the grant of b...